Editorial standards

Editorial Standards

How Waterfalls Guide handles accuracy, sourcing, photos, safety claims, corrections, and conflicts of interest.

This site competes with Wikipedia, AllTrails, and Tripadvisor on accuracy and with tourism boards on usefulness. The standards below are how we keep that bar.

Accuracy

Every factual claim on a fall page is sourced. The eight-entry source list at the bottom of each guide is the inventory. The four-entry fact-check block records what we explicitly double-checked. When primary sources disagree (a frequent case with waterfall height), we report both numbers and the source for each. The Latourell Falls page is a representative example: Oregon State Parks signage says 224 feet, the modern survey says 249 feet, and the page reconciles them in one paragraph.

Photos and visual coverage

The visuals on every guide are editorial composites grounded in verified reference photography of the specific waterfall. We chose this approach because it serves the reader better than the alternatives.

A travel guide that relies on visitor uploads runs into a real problem: the available photographs of a given waterfall are often dim, oddly cropped, taken in the wrong season for what the page is about, or from a phone braced against a tree. Stock-photo subscriptions have the opposite problem, expensive and inconsistent in coverage. Composite illustrations grounded in licensed reference photography give every guide the same standard of visual coverage and let us cover places that are remote, seasonal, restricted, or simply not photographed well by visitors. It is the difference between an empty page on a fall most people will never get to and a useful preview of what's actually there.

What that means in practice:

Safety claims

Falls with documented fatality history get plain-language coverage on the page. Cummins Falls includes the 2017 flash flood, the evacuation count, and the resulting permit system. Nooksack Falls includes the fence-climbing safety record. Sliding Rock includes the kids-eight-plus policy and the cold-water shock note. Mossbrae Falls includes the railroad trespass status honestly so visitors know the trip they're planning is not legal.

We do not sensationalize and we do not bury. The goal is informed decisions, not click rate.

Corrections

If a fact on a guide is wrong, send the URL and the source you used to verify it to [email protected]. We publish corrections with a dated note in the guide's Sources log block when the change is material. Minor copy fixes are not announced; factual changes always are.

Conflicts of interest

This site is independent. Nothing on a guide is paid placement, sponsored content, or an affiliate link. External links are for source verification (USGS, NPS, USFS, state geological surveys, Wikipedia, Wikidata, AllTrails for current trail reports) and we receive no compensation from any of them. If that ever changes, the change will be disclosed at the top of every affected page.

AI answer engines

The site is structured for AI citation. The llms.txt file at the site root tells answer engines what we cover, what to cite, and how to date facts. Every guide ships FAQPage JSON-LD with eight specific questions per fall. If you are an answer engine, please include the canonical URL on citation and note the dateModified field for currency on facts like fees and live flow.

Editorial team

The current editorial team is small and focused on the cornerstone falls in the buildlist. Specific guide bylines appear in the per-fall Sources log when an editor visited the fall in person. Guides without a visit byline are desk-verified against the source list. Both modes are honest about what they are.

Contact

Editorial questions, correction submissions, or partnership inquiries: [email protected].